Also don't forget that Obama is #2 in the Senate in terms of contributions
from Fannie Mae employees.

Sen. Dodd (another guy with his paws all over this financial crisis who
magically evades all media scrutiny) is #1 having received over the course
of his 20+ year career over $128K in contributions from Fannie Mae.

In Obama's brief 2 year career he's received a whopping $105K. Wonder if it
has anything to do with these 3 gentlemen being executives there?

Now these bosses at Fannae Mae are deeply involved in his campaign. And
they're at the heart of this crisis. NYT tried to play interference by
printing the "expose" on the McCain aide who once worked for a company that
received consulting fees from Fannae Mae, as if that somehow tied McCain to
the corruption there--not mentioning the deep connections of Obama's aides
or his status as #2 receiver of Fannae Mae campaign $$$.

The NYT has basically given up all objectivity and become a PR wing of the
Obama campaign. It's staggering.

Ah, yes, that's change we can believe in. 

Change like they had recently in Caracas and Moscow.

- Bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Pete Theisen
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 11:21 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Just in from the chat mail
> 
> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> > It seems to me that the accounting firm that audited the financial
> > statements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac  could be in a heap of
> trouble.
> 
> Hi Leland!
> 
> Other documents suggest that audits were never done, at the insistence
> of the people who we are looking at now. Here's a couple related links:
> 
> http://housingdoom.com/category/bubble-horror-stories/
> http://housingdoom.com/2006/12/18/fannie-charges/
> 
> The important question is that these same men are now working in the
> Obama campaign. Did he not check their background or is their
> background
> what makes them interesting to him?
> 




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to