Hi Everybody!
http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=270
"A year after the 9/11 attack, The New York Times' Frank Rich was
carping about Bush's national security plans, saying we could judge
Bush's war on terror by whether there was a major al-Qaida attack in
2003, which -- according to Rich -- would have been on al-Qaida's normal
schedule.
Rich wrote: "Since major al-Qaida attacks are planned well in advance
and have historically been separated by intervals of 12 to 24 months, we
will find out how much we've been distracted soon enough." ("Never
Forget What?" New York Times, Sept. 14, 2002.)
There wasn't a major al-Qaida attack in 2003. Nor in 2004, 2005, 2006 or
2007. Manifestly, liberals thought there would be: They announced a
standard of success that they expected Bush to fail. "
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
