http://tinyurl.com/3tadyd
- - -
Who is Odinga and why should Americans care about his close ties to Barack
Obama? The story is so big with so many tentacles it's hard to decide where
to begin the telling. Key players include Barack Obama, Obama cousin Raila
Odinga, Kenyan jihadi Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi and Obama's father and mother.
We'll start tonight with Obama and Odinga. Later, we'll try to fit other
pieces into the sordid international puzzle that Barack Obama brings to the
U.S. political table.
Of greatest concern to Americans should be what Obama's moves in Kenya say
about his likely willingness to encourage global jihad. We're not talking
here about merely pulling troops out of Iraq. This guy, Obama, campaigned
for his jihadi cousin, Odinga, in 2006 as Kenya was preparing for the vote
in 2007.
In his failed bid to topple the current Kenyan president, Odinga allegedly
entered the written agreement linked below with Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi. In
it, Odinga agreed, among other things, to make Islamic Sharia law the law of
Kenya if the Sheikh would deliver the votes to put Odinga over the top
(click the pic to access the full text):
<snip - click on the PDF link yourself>
[July 8, 2008 update: Some have questioned the authenticity of the above
document. See my detailed discussion of this issue here, concluding that
this MoU is probably genuine despite popular media reports to the contrary].
On page one, Odinga bows to Islam, acknowledging it as "the only true
religion." And that is just the tip of the political iceberg. We can only
hope that it sinks Obama's boat before it reaches Pennsylvania Avenue.
Otherwise, we may have hell and Islam to pay around the globe. Far from
being a relatively harmless Carterian peacenik, Obama could ignite world war
as no one ever has.
After Odinga failed to capture the Kenyan presidency and Odinga's followers
began hacking and burning their way across Kenya, Barack Obama - according
to Odinga's January 8, 2008 BBC radio interview - called Odinga twice, on
January 7, 2008, apparently to express his support for Odinga. More on that
interview, including an audio link, at the BBC.
Isn't it fair to ask how any candidate with this kind of personal and
political baggage can be a serious candidate for the presidency of the
United States?
Melanie Phillips of Spectator UK was mystified, in January, at the American
media's braindead treatment of Obama's Kenyan connections and their
connection to global jihad:
"While I was away, reading about the appalling atrocities in Kenya in
which churches were torched and dozens of Christians burned to death, I
wondered whether any mainstream media would get the point. They didn't. As
far as I could see, the violence was universally ascribed to 'tribal
conflict'."
- - -
Oh, come on, they're not blood cousins, Obama's uncle debunked that one.
Move along, sheeple, nothing to see here either!
And just because Odinga incited murder and mayhem to get the Prime Minister
post after losing the election by over 230,000 votes doesn't mean Obama
will! Just because Obama actively supported him throughout all this and has
been in phone communication with him doesn't mean he supports him! What
proof do you have that he actually supports him? Only him on film at Odinga
rallies as a US Senator, and some emails back and forth using his Senate
email account. Pretty flimsy, I'd say!
(ACORN is seeing to it that Obama doesn't end up on the short end of the
electoral stick anyway... So it's all moot. Just sing the praises of our
next Dear Leader!)
Baaa-aa-aaaa-aaah.
- Bob
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
