http://tinyurl.com/3ted55

- - -
There IS a RICO investigation of ACORN and the Obama campaign underway -
this has now been established by the mainstream media. Right now it's
rumored here in Chicago that Patrick Fitzgerald is heading it (confirmation
on that has not come yet). There is a lot of activity in Chicago right now,
with a lot of IRS agents looking into the finances coming in and out of this
city, and across state lines (this was established on Monday when the GOP
issued emergency press releases that much of Obama's campaign contributions
could very well be illegal foreign contributions - what appears to be
deliberately poor record keeping designed to hide the true identities and
monetary sources of online donors is at issue here). We see in 15 states now
that ACORN is being busted for attempted voter fraud, and for fraudulent,
illegal voter registratons in the hundreds of thousands, if not a million.
The article below states, and we have confirmed this with people who know
for sure, that the people who gathered evidence of Obama's fraud and voter
intimidation techniques during the primaries against Hillary Clinton are
sharing everything they have with the Republican Party and the federal
government.

What's happening here is something we have never seen before: centrist
Clinton Democrats and Republicans are working together to expose the DNC and
Obama campaign's illegal activities and orchestrated, coordinated fraud.
Both parties are working with federal agents to investigate ACORN, which has
been funded with upwards of $800,000 in questionable donations from the
Obama campaign (in what appears to be the expressed and explicit direction
to engineer voter fraud in the general election). The tactics being employed
now in the 15 states currently under investigation are the VERY SAME TACTICS
we saw on the ground in Iowa, Texas, Colorado, Nebraska, Indiana, and other
states working for Hillary Clinton in the primaries.

And all of this ties back to Chicago.

Where the Obama campaign and DNC are now based.

Where people we know tip us off to little things to pay attention to that,
when pieced together with all the other little pieces that are revealing
themselves, leads to a single conclusion: there will be indictments for all
of this.

We don't know when they will come - but they will come. There is just too
much here to ignore.

"Why didn't the federal government get involved in the primaries?", some
people ask in comments.  Well, we aren't lawyers, but someone told us
yesterday that the primaries are party affairs and are not governed by
federal election laws. We're sure a legal scholar will comment on this and
set us straight. The parties set the rules for their primaries.but the
general election IS governed by federal election law. This is why Florida
and Michigan were allowed to be such a mess for Democrats, and why Donna
Brazile and Howard Dean got away with taking delegates away from Hillary
Clinton and giving them, unearned, to Obama for Michigan: no federal agency
had any ability to step in and ensure a fair resolution of the Michigan and
Florida votes. This was 100% in the hands of the Democratic party, which
intended to award Obama its nomination since 2004. The party never intended
to allow Hillary Clinton to win this thing - they always wanted Obama, and
the party thus turned a deaf ear to our constant and repeated complaints of
voter fraud, intimidation, and other thuggery by the Obama campaign from
January through June.

That means, technically, nothing Obama did during the primaries was
illegal.if our understanding of election law is true and political party
primaries are not safeguarded under federal law. Tthe things his campaign is
orchestrating now, however, ARE violations of the law.

Thus, all the evidence Clinton supporters and Republicans have gathered of
fraud and voter intimidation during the primaries establishes the pattern of
behavior that's allowing RICO investigators to clearly discern a national
conspiracy, rooted in Chicago, to hijack this election and defraud the will
of the people. It's all background information, with the RICO case seemingly
evolving from the 15 separate investigations now underway in all states
busting ACORN offices.

...

All of this is still developing and we do not know how many more breaks in
this story will come before November 4th. We do detect a purposeful breaking
of something new in this story every few days. Monday was the reports of
illegal contributions to the Obama campaign from overseas that tied into the
$800,000 given to ACORN by Obama. On Wednesday, all Hell broke lose in 15
states with ACORN offices left and right busted for massive voter fraud
operations. We don't know about other cities, but lawyers here in Chicago
are talking about something BIG going down. On in-trade, someone short-sold
Obama and bought $140,000 in shares for a McCain win on November 4th,
dropping Obama's intrade price from roughly $75/share to $64/share or so.

When a storm is coming, some know, some don't. The ones that know do odd
things that make sense only in retrospect. Right now, we are noticing a lot
of odd things and are piecing this together as best we can to see patterns
emerging.

Whenever a storm brews for Obama, the media ratchets up its cheerleading,
and those in the tank for him do whatever they can to protect him. That's
why we've also noticed the polling companies changing their party ID samples
in the last two or three weeks, upping Democrats' party ID to 50% in some
polls, and dropping Republicans down to just 20%, with 30% Independent. If
you look at this critically, you'd see that Democrats have never enjoyed
more than a 4% historical party ID advantage. In 2006, a year that Democrats
RAGED against both Bush and the sex-scandal plagued GOP (Mark Foley, Larry
Craig, and other characters), Democrats had just a 3% party ID advantage.
All of this means polls should be using samples with 39% Democrats, 35%
Republican, and 26% Independent.

The polling samples are manipulated to give Obama higher poll numbers than
he really in fact has, as reflective of support in the electorate. Some
people believe this is all being done as cover for the voter fraud - so that
Obama polls higher than he should in states where ACORN's activities are
meant to pump illegal votes in to push him much higher than he would be in
an actual, legitimate election. The polls, in essence, are thus showing that
ACORN is expected to deliver that 11% party ID advantage to Democrats, by
bringing the dead, ineligible felons, and homeless multi-voters to the
voting booths. The polls thus seem rigged to produce the results Obama
wants.and ACORN is the muscle to make sure results are delivered to match
the established polls.
- - -

Hmmm. Owners of the site claim to be " mostly over-educated, 30-something,
urban, white, gay men living in Chicago, but with roots in Detroit,
Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Kentucky, Oregon, and upstate New York. So, we know a
thing or two about swing-states, and a lot about SoetorObama because we've
been active in the political scene here in Chicago for years, and have seen
what SoetorObama and his lovely wife are like up close and personal."

But they are Hillary supporters and the article sounds, on the surface,
plausible. In any case, something is up with ACORN--no doubt about that
after the offices were raided; Obama DID gift them at least $800K for vote
mobilization efforts; and Hillary was screwed during the primaries by her
own party, and I remember the charges about voter intimidation and fraud.
So, something to watch, anyway.

I post this one more for amusement than as an actual endorsement, per se.
But part of me hopes it's true.

Isn't that the theme of this election? Hope? Hope for change?

- Bob



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to