>Oh, sure. So they aren't Marxist-Leninists. Thus, obviously, they are >racists on the order of George Wallace.
>I campaigned for Wallace in '72. He didn't strike me then as anywhere >near as racist as the press branded him, not even close. He doesn't yet. >In retrospect, he was open-minded compared to today's Ds. I also found it interesting the writer didn't care for Wallace picking on the press. When Ollie North was running for Senate here in VA, I saw him several times... got to talk with him twice... and he always picked on the press at his meetings. He would joke about them to the audience... he would tell us that every morning he read the Washington Post and his Bible...that way he could see what both sides were up to. If one is going to elevate the drive by media to a position of infalable, unquestioning allegiance, they have a problem. I never was a Wallace supporter, but I did appreciate the unapologetic way got in the face of political correctness. -- Larry Miller --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body -- kept) message/rfc822 --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
