Perhaps the below link will provide you with some direction regarding 
the issue of impeaching an elected congressmen or congresswomen.  I 
believe Michele Backmann is knowingly making false accusation aimed at 
inciting Anti-Democrat, Anti-Liberal sentiments within the country and 
congress, much like Hitler stirred antisemitism against the Jews during 
his rise to power.  This is a vary danger road that history teaches can 
lead to untold grief and misery, if not stopped in its early stages.

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20010910_grossman.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/5l8g8r

Regards,

LelandJ



Michael Madigan wrote:
> What high crimes or misdemeanors has she committed?
>
> ************************************************* 
> Barack Obama Antichrist gear
>
> http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike
>
>
> --- On Tue, 10/21/08, Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   
>> From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [OT] US Congresswoman Questions Liberals as Anti American
>> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 12:03 AM
>> Pete Theisen wrote:
>>     
>>> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Congresswomen  Michele Bachmann seems to be
>>>>         
>> implying that all liberals 
>>     
>>>> in congress are Anti-american, and seems to feel
>>>>         
>> that the press should 
>>     
>>>> conduct a McCarthy like witch hunt for
>>>>         
>> Anti-americans in congress.
>>     
>>>> Congresswomen Bachmann give a whole new definition
>>>>         
>> to the label 
>>     
>>>> "Liberal" in her attempt to stir up
>>>>         
>> hate/fear, so the Republican party 
>>     
>>>> can divide and conquer any opposition party.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mJiF3p0kFw
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Hi Leland!
>>>
>>> Once again, you have it wrong, or are trying to
>>>       
>> deceive. The interviewer 
>>     
>>> guy was trying to get her to say who was anti-American
>>>       
>> and she kept 
>>     
>>> saying we should find out, not implying anything.
>>>       
>> McCarthy was 
>>     
>>> government, not press - huge difference. As it is, the
>>>       
>> press 
>>     
>>> investigates the people who love America, and leaves
>>>       
>> the liberal haters 
>>     
>>> to hate their souls away.
>>>
>>> Congresswoman Bachman is in no way doing what you
>>>       
>> accuse her of. You are 
>>     
>>> the hater, not Congressman Bachman.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Can a state impeach a congresswomen they elected?
>>
>> http://minnesotaindependent.com/13721/tinklenberg-responds-to-bachmanns-anti-american-statements
>>
>> or
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/59cloe
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> LelandJ
>>
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/alternative
>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>   text/html
>> ---
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Post Messages to: [email protected]
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
>> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
>> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
>> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
>>     
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to