On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really?  So you don't think a war hero would be better than a guy with ties 
> to Palestinian and Domestic terrorists, communists, and socialists?
>
> *************************************************

Do you have anything past calling names for me to consider.  I dislike
both at this point for office of President.

Whenever any speaks of "my" plan I would like some list of details to
see if you have more then the title of your next book of fiction.

I consider War hero and Perfect SAT score as great back then, but what
have you been doing the past 25 years.

In reality what could McCain do with a veto proof congress?

Had McCain slammed the Senate for the pile of rubbish they pushed
through in the "Save the world as we now know it" bill I would be for
him.  that was a promise that he has made over and over in debates as
well as prior runs for the office.  To bad it was all lip service.

Obama is just slick, to a fault now a days.  His reply to McCain in
the race back to Washington was classic.  The President will have to
multitask on a daily basis.  Or something along those lines.  Anyway
it was not only true, but showed some sort of leadership instead of
blind following.  To bad he voted for the same bill without voicing a
displeasure over the pork.

Ron Paul is still looking better then both of these knee jerkers.

YMMV


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to