How about a new os that will run on a 3yo computer?

************************************************* 
 


--- On Thu, 10/30/08, geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Microsoft reveals features of Windows 7
> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>
> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 1:44 AM
> If windows 7 is actually faster using less ram then Im
> already sold. 
> I guess Im just sick of each new version of windows being
> slower and 
> using more resources than the predecessor. Id just like to
> see a new 
> version where EVERYTHING was better and not a tradeoff that
> leads to 
> it being AT BEST, the same.
> 
> At 03:24 PM 30/10/2008, you wrote:
> >Geoff,
> >
> >It has been reported that Windows 7 addresses your
> concerns for 
> >underpowered and low memory
> >configurations. The demo was done on a 1GHz 1GB RAM
> machine. The OS 
> >was taking 512MBs of RAM.
> >Considering anyone who is serious about liking Vista
> recommends 
> >twice these numbers to get average
> >performance today, I think Microsoft is headed in the
> correct 
> >direction for this "feature".
> >
> >Cracks me up how serious the discussion is for
> something that has 
> >not even reached beta yet. Guess
> >the buzz is high for this product already (good or
> bad).
> >
> >Rick
> >White Light Computing, Inc.
> >
> >www.whitelightcomputing.com
> >www.swfox.net
> >www.rickschummer.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to