Ted Roche wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Gil Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Perhaps, but I feel this is worthy of no worse than an [NF] subject >> designation. > > It has no technical aspects. It has little if anything to do with > running a technology business. It's US-centric. And it's annoying. > Sounds like [OT] to me. Please take it there, or kill it. > > >
Sheep. There...killed it. (And had already apologized for the missed label, but seeing how you don't get my emails, well, ...) I'll gladly donate a $1 fine to the next VFP convention. Just give me the link to the PayPal. <g> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
