This is Hitler selecting Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel all over again.

************************************************* 
Barack Obama is not My President

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike


--- On Sat, 11/8/08, Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] O-boy breaks 2 promises already
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 6:34 PM
> Emanuel will be working for President-elect Obama.  As you
> probably 
> know, the most important criterion in keeping any job is to
> insure your 
> boss like you, so if Emanuel crosses President-elect Obama,
> then Emanuel 
> will have a problem.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > According to Dick Morris, Bill Clinton couldn't
> trust Emanuel because he would selectively leak information
> to the press to make himself look good.  
> >
> > ************************************************* 
> > Barack Obama is not My President
> >
> > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike
> >
> >
> > --- On Sat, 11/8/08, Leland F. Jackson, CPA
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Subject: Re: [OT] O-boy breaks 2 promises already
> >> To: "ProFox Email List"
> <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008, 5:42 PM
> >> The Chief of Staff, like the vice president,
> serves the
> >> president and is 
> >> duty bound to reconcile to the President's
> wishes, so
> >> I'm sure, if Rahm 
> >> Emanuel become too divisive, abrasive, or
> contentious,
> >> President Obama 
> >> will straighten him out.  LOL  The mere
> appointment of Rahm
> >> Emanuel to 
> >> "Chief of Staff" is not a breach of
> >> President-elect Obamas commitment to 
> >> set aside partisan politic and unite Americans for
> the good
> >> of our nation.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> LelandJ
> >>
> >> Michael Oke, II wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Perhaps you need to be introduced to the fact
> that
> >>>       
> >> here, in the United 
> >>     
> >>> States of America, we are permitted to discuss
> the
> >>>       
> >> choices made by the 
> >>     
> >>> President-elect and compare them to what he
> said
> >>>       
> >> during his campaign.
> >>     
> >>> ::michael
> >>>
> >>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> All of you reps... YOU LOST.
> >>>> The man won and he does NOT owe you
> nothing and
> >>>>         
> >> he's not asking for YOUR
> >>     
> >>>> permission. So shut your asses! If you
> don't
> >>>>         
> >> like what he's doing then
> >>     
> >>>> wait a few years and campaign. After all,
> that is
> >>>>         
> >> democracy.
> >>     
> >>>> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> Hastert would hardly qualify as a
> >>>>>>             
> >> "new tone" selection either.  Are you 
> >>     
> >>>>>> trying to tell me that he
> couldn't
> >>>>>>             
> >> have found someone that might 
> >>     
> >>>>>> actually have been able to bridge
> the
> >>>>>>             
> >> chasm that exists between the two 
> >>     
> >>>>>> parties?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   
> >>>>>>     
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>> I though he did, when he selected
> Congressman
> >>>>>           
> >> Rahm Emanuel, and btw, who 
> >>     
> >>>>> would you suggest?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> LelandJ
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> ::michael
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
> >>>>>>   
> >>>>>>     
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>> And who would you have picked,
> former
> >>>>>>>               
> >> speaker of the house Denis 
> >>     
> >>>>>>> Hastert?  LOL
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNIqZEDghMU
> >>     
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> LelandJ
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Pete Theisen wrote:
> >>>>>>>     
> >>>>>>>       
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> Hi Everybody!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>
> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/11/07/obama-already-broken-two-promises-will-media-report
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/67ug7y
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "The first broken
> promise was
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> the one where the candidate of "change" 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> was going to bring a new
> tone to
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> Washington. This one has been broken by 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> Obama's choice for
> Chief of
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> Staff: Rahm Emanuel. Representative Emanuel 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> (D- Illinois) is a
> hard-core, far
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> left, liberal as well as being an old 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> Clinton hack. Not only
> that, but
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> Emanuel is not a "new tone" kind of guy 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> but is a Pit bull of epic
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> proportions. The parallel would have been 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> McCain claiming a new tone
> but
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> picking Karl Rove as his Chief of Staff. 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> Emanuel is little
> different than
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> Terry MCauliffe or Howard Dean in his 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> vehement and vocal attacks
> on
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> Republicans. So much for the "new tone" 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> Obama claimed he wanted to
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> foster."
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> "And now comes his
> second
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> broken promise. Politico reported on November 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> 5 that Barack Obama has
> stepped
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> back from his claim that lobbyists would 
> >>     
> >>>>>>>> not have a place in his
> new
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >> administration."
> >>     
> >>>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>>>       
> >>>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>>     
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to