Stephen Russell wrote: > Then he continued: 'You see, in order for you not to have to take care > of 2 babies at the same time, let's kill the one in your arms. This way, > you could rest some before the other one is born. If we're going to kill > one of them, it doesn't matter which one it is. There would be no risk > for your body if you chose the one in your arms. > > The lady was horrified and said: 'No doctor! How terrible! It's a crime > to kill a child!
Hi Stephen! There, now you've done it - offended the precious liberals. Have you no regard for the "logical" argument that if she kills this one now she might go on to have two others later when it is more "convenient"? How could you? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
