On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 23:11, Matt Slay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I follow the common practice of using type prefixes when naming custom > Properties in classes and forms like this: > > lAddMode > cName > > Now then, is it also common to use those same prefixes when naming custom > Methods that return known types?
I haven't seen that much. Do try to pick a system and stay with it: it reduces confusion down the road. Apple has some suggestions for method naming at http://tinyurl.com/CocoaNamingConventions -- some of them are general enough to apply here. Google brings up a few other suggestions, as well. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
