Paul McNett wrote: > Ted Roche wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I resist highly-defined development processes. >> If the definition means that it's fixed and static and therefore >> brittle and restrictive, I agree. If it's a collection of best >> practices, the kind of stuff we're already doing, only better and more >> automated: self-unit-testing, TDD, BDD, small, quick rapid iterations >> with lots of client involvement, continuous integration testing, >> well-integrated source code control, well, those can be really >> empowering to cowboy developers to do the work they love to do. > > I agree! It's just that when looking at something like what Stephen posted, > my eyes > gloss over and I think "endless meetings".
I'll say it again: Stephen is the classic "Enterprise" developer...everything about him says that and his comments are aptly so for that kind of developer. <snipped> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
