According to the "United States housing bubble" Wiki, On October 15, 
2008, Anthony Faiola, Ellen Nakashima and Jill Drew , wrote a lengthy 
article in the Washington Post titled, "What Went Wrong."  In their 
investigation, the authors claim that Greenspan vehemently opposed any 
regulation of financial instruments known as derivatives.  They further 
claim that Greenspan actively sought to undermine the office of the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, specifically under the leadership 
of Brooksley E. Born, when the Commission sought to initiate regulation 
of derivatives. Ultimately, it was the collapse of a specific kind of 
derivative, the Mortgage Backed Security, that triggered the economic 
crisis of 2008.  On October 17, 2008, attorney Timothy D. Naegele, wrote 
an article in the American Banker entitled, "Greenspan's Fingerprints 
All Over Enduring Mess," which argues that Greenspan's actions and 
inactions triggered the economic crisis of 2008.  The article discusses 
the economic tsunami that has been rolling worldwide with devastating 
effects; and the author asserts that Greenspan is the architect of the 
enormous economic "bubble" that burst globally. The author cites Giulio 
Tremonti, Italy's Minister of Economy and Finance, who said: "Greenspan 
was considered a master. Now we must ask ourselves whether he is not, 
after [Osama] bin Laden, the man who hurt America the most."

On June 2, 1987 President Reagan nominates Greenspan for chairman of the 
Federal Reserve Board, which he served for five terms until  January 31, 
2006.  He served under the following presidents:

2 terms - Ronald Reagan - Republican
1 term - George H. W. Bush - Republican
2 terms - Bill Clinton - Democrat
2 terms -George W. Bush - Republican

Therefore, the republican must assume 5/7 responsibility for the credit 
crisis, and the Democrats must assume 2/7 responsibility for the credit 
crisis.  LOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_housing_bubble

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage-backed_security

Regards,

LelandJ




Pete Theisen wrote:
> John wrote:
>   
>> <Now its just a matter of getting people into the houses so the big
>> banks can retire the old mortgages in default with new mortgages that are
>> performing on the underlying real estate collateral.>
>>     
>
> Hi John!
>
> The people didn't have to even move. They could just refinance into one 
> of the "new mortgages" based on the bubble "value" of their home. And 
> they had to do that just to stay alive because all their neighbors were 
> doing it. Prices of everything else rose to absorb the new "money", most 
> of this going for food, fuel, health care and other everyday necessities.
>
> Same old house, big new debt.
>   



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to