Geoff Flight wrote: > Finally I know what you are talking about 'Dec 5'. Has it made any impact on > your local media because it is a big zero here. That kinda indicates that > no-one is taking it very seriously or considering it credible. > > ON a sidebar tho., the notion of a President having to be natural-born seems > a bit archaic in the modern world. I'm sure you probably think it is fine > but would Obama have won against Arnie???
Hi Geoff! Media is in the tank for O-boy. might not report it if he is tossed. They wouldn't have opposed each other. They are both foreign born liberals. Also, he didn't get past the R vetting. >> In 4 years you can try again. It's called democracy - you should look into >> it. > In three days we can try again. The Birth Certificate case goes to > conference before the Supreme Court Friday, Dec 5. The only reason the > "President-Elect" would possibly be hiding his birth certificate is that > it disqualifies him. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
