On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dunno about documentation. I'm very much a get-your-hands-dirty kind of > guy. I was > able to poke around connecting via odbc and issuing sql to find what I needed > and > sort it out. Yep, I could even post a non-balanced entry to G/L. ;) ------------------------------------------- You think that the db should have that protection built in? That is a business rule that could allow multiple transactions to define a full GL Entry, from MPOV. It sucks that the overhead to enforce that type of rule in the db could really slow things down. Demanding transactions to wrap the whole process and all which tends to put a lock on the blasted table and all. :) Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
