Michael Madigan wrote: > If the Presidential candidate refuses to show his birth certificate, that > ssems to most people that he's hiding something.
>>> No, he's only allowed to ask 2 justices. That was >> his last shot and Thomas thought it was valid enough to accept >> it. >> >> We'll just have to see what happens. >> >>> Why wouldn't the elibility of the President of the >> United States be a valid case? >> Sure, if that were actually at state. It is a bogus case >> and I hate seeing the justices waste their time on it. Hi Michael! It couldn't be a waste of time. The waste of time has been the stonewall, not the efforts to pierce the veil of secrecy and lies. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
