>From my benchmarking, my Vista 64bit laptop, 4G RAM, 350G HD is much slower than a 6 year old XP Pro desktop. Yes, laptop vs desktop, but I would have thought that 5 years of Moore's Law would have handled that ... and more. My benchmarks show it's like 25% slower using VFP. Yes, that's what counts for me.
I think that Linux with effects turned on looks better than Vista. Just my $0.02. -Kevin CULLY Technologies, LLC Stephen Russell wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:55 PM, KAM.covad <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I have already put 2 'Crapsta' computers back on Win2000. Solved all my >> problems. >> > ---------------------------------- > > > I have been using Vista for 5 months as my primary computer now and > find it better then XP. > > Sure it was a new purchase of hardware, laptop. 250 gig drive dual > core chip and 3 gig of ram. > > Past FF screwing the ram, the work environmet is better than XP gave. > The look and feel is real nice. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
