Buenos Aires without Argentinians! Brilliant! ************************************************* 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice
http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Mon, 1/26/09, John <[email protected]> wrote: > From: John <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character reference from Castro > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 8:55 AM > No, I meant it would be ok if they had gassed > Argentenians!<G> > > John Harvey > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Ricardo Aráoz > Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 4:46 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character > reference from > Castro > > John wrote: > > The chemicals were sold to Iraq in order to fight the > Iranians, not to > kill > > their own people and somehow I think you know that. > > > > > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml > > > > But former U.S. ambassador to Baghdad David Newton > contended in a Post > > interview, "Fundamentally, the policy was > justified. We were concerned > that > > Iraq should not lose the war with Iran, because that > would have threatened > > Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. Our long-term hope was that > Hussein's > government > > would become less repressive and more > responsible." > > > > The U.S. removed Iraq from its list of states that > sponsor terrorism in > > 1982, and as Iran made gains on the battlefield, the > Reagan administration > > decided to pass intelligence to Iraq. > > > > The policy to do this was captured in a November 1983 > National Security > > Directive that is still classified, but apparently > stated that U.S. policy > > was to do "whatever was necessary and legal" > to stop Iran from winning. > > > > At the same time, there were multiple reports Iraq was > using chemical > > weapons to repulse the Iranian advance; one State > Department official told > > Secretary of State George Shultz that Iraq was > engaging in "almost daily > use > > of (chemical weapons)" against Iranian troops. > > > > > > > > John Harvey > > > So you mean to say that if Saddam had gassed Iranian towns > and cities > instead of Iraqi towns and cities it would have been ok > with you. Way to > go! Wonderful morals! I want to be USAF! > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
