On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: > >> The New Testament is very different from the Old Testament version. >> So The Lord "AK" <after kids> has a different philosophy much like the >> rest of us who changed in our own AK state. > > So he was immature? I.e., Imperfect? Or was he perfect then, and now > is imperfect?
God is what God is. Your desire to classify and thereby set in stone a set of principles associated with that position is not relevant to the situation. Because God is what God is. Otherwise we get into the your going to hell because your God is different from my God. > Would you change your philosophy based on having a kid if a) your kid > was guaranteed to be perfect, and b) the worst that could ever happen > to him is that if he gets killed, he sleeps it off for a couple of > days and is fine afterwards. And talk about a deadbeat dad: he knocks > up some married chick and then sticks her husband with the joys of > raising a bastard son. ----------------------------------------- Sorry you missed the many points that the Son was making. He had knowledge to be respected by everyone. Followers of the Jewish faith, Samaratins, as well as Romans grasped that he was more than just the son of man. The Pharisees were in a power shock situation because they were subservient to Rome, and now this kid comes from the wrong side of the tracks and has all the answers. Their motto or ideals were "The Law love it and follow/worship my_knowledge/me or your going to hell." -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer First Horizon Bank Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
