There were and still are a bunch of fakes who prey on grieving people. I have a friend who used to go to gypsy fortune tellers, and they would all tell him that he had a love curse on him and for a few dollars, they could remove it. LOL
The gypsies sized him up. A guy with no wedding ring, with not a lot of charisma, and they knew he wasn't a hit with the ladies. ************************************************* 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Thu, 1/29/09, Geoff Flight <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Geoff Flight <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character reference from Castro > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 5:58 PM > There is a great body of proof. Your existence as a sentient > being is one. > The physical universe with its amazing order and structure > is another. > > The amount of proof has never been a problem. We see the > creation of the > universe as some gigantic random event rather than a > designed place created > by a Designer because it suits our mindset. You are looking > for ABSOLUTE > proof but you wont find it in this life. But you believe in > a round earth > despite never having orbited the earth. Observation from > the surface > suggests it is true but it is far from absolute truth. The > other evidence > you have is second-hand. Does that make it trustworthy? > > For billions of people all thru history, a belief in GOD > has not been a > problem. They see Him, talk to Him and see His acts. I > believe Martin Luther > King existed but he never spoke to me o visited me. I never > saw him for real > and never will. All I have is other peoples accounts and we > all know how > unreliable eye-witness accounts. I don't have any > reason to doubt his > existence because so many people say it is true - invluding > vast numbers of > people who also never saw him. > > It isn't that simple. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Nicholas Geti > Sent: Friday, 30 January 2009 8:31 AM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character > reference from > Castro > > There is zero proof of the supernatural. Houdini spent his > lifetime exposing > > charlatans because he knew all the tricks and didn't > like people cheating > the public. He never claimed he was supernatural. > > Tell me one proof. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Madigan" > <[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 6:37 PM > Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character > reference from > Castro > > > > There is enough proof of the "supernatural" > to understand that our > > understanding of science is still limited. God and > Science do co-exist, > > we just don't understand the science of the > supernatural. > > > > ************************************************* > > 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice > > > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 > > > > > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Geoff Flight > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> From: Geoff Flight <[email protected]> > >> Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after > character reference from > >> Castro > >> To: "'ProFox Email List'" > <[email protected]> > >> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 5:43 PM > >> There a a number or aspects of our physical world > which > >> millennia ago were > >> contradictory and unexplainable - 'a > mystery' until > >> science explained it. > >> The terms 'contradictory and absurd' are > often > >> nothing more than 'we don't > >> understand it at all'. At the subatomic level > many of > >> the laws of physics > >> seem not to apply. Particles exist and behave in > manners > >> that are > >> contradictory and absurd. The arrogance is in > thinking that > >> something is > >> wrong because you personally cannot understand it > and fit > >> it into your > >> mindset. The universe is bigger than you. God is > vastly > >> bigger than you and > >> your understanding (or not) of both doesn't > alter their > >> existence in any > >> shape or form. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > >> Of Ken Kixmoeller/fh > >> Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2009 4:59 AM > >> To: ProFox Email List > >> Subject: Re: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after > character > >> reference from > >> Castro > >> > >> > >> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Stephen Russell > wrote: > >> > >> > God is what God is. Your desire to classify > and > >> thereby set in stone > >> > a set of principles associated with that > position is > >> not relevant to > >> > the situation. Because God is what God is. > >> > >> Reminds me of the George Carlin bit about going to > Catholic > >> school -- > >> when obviously self-contradictory or patently > absurd tenets > >> of the > >> Faith came up and got questioned by students, the > priests > >> would > >> answer "Well, it's a mystery." Gee > thanks, > >> father. That clears it all > >> up. > >> > >> Ken > >> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
