Geoff Flight wrote:
> 4+ dimensional theory (as an alternative to string theory) actually provides
> a theoretical model on which the Big Bang works very well. It explains both
> the expanding universe (how infinity can actually increase) and in no way
> excludes God - in fact includes the possibly of His existence very well.
>
>   
It also includes the "possibility" of me being emperor of the earth.
But, as with god, it was not very probable. Pity!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: Friday, 30 January 2009 2:11 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character reference from
> Castro
>
> On Jan 29, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>   
>> There was a big ball of dust and it blew up.  Strange starting point
>> for the universe right
>>     
>
>
>       OK, I'll grant that that's a stretch. Now let's look at yours:  
> nothing except an all-powerful, all-knowing being who then created  
> that big ball of dust out of nothing.
>
>       We've both got to explain the dust, but now you've got something
> that  
> is much, much more complex and difficult to claim "was just there".  
> Surely if it's acceptable to assume that such an amazingly complex and  
> powerful being was "just there", it's gotta be OK to just assume a  
> ball of dust.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>   



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to