On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Geoff Flight wrote:
> What total rubbish!
Right back at you!
> Even the term 'supernatural' is a primitive one. 'super
> natural' means that someone behaves outside the laws of the universe
> which
> actually means the KNOWN laws of the universe.
No, it also means something that cannot be measured or observed
independently.
> The subatomic behaves in a
> way contrary to many of the established laws of Newtonian physics.
> We don’t
> call it supernatural, we assume our 'laws' are inadequate - which
> they are.
> 4+ dimensional theory (which clearly you have no idea of) formulates
> a model
> of the universe that makes much of the 'supernatural' part of the
> base
> model. And yes, it does provide a theoretical construct for both
> heaven and
> God although that is not its intent.
You are confusing current limits of knowledge with things that never
able to be known, only believed.
> If you faith and belief extends only as far as science tells you and
> that
> which you can prove you will live a limited existence.
What condescending crap: "what science tells you". As if we are
passive consumers of some questionable source called "science".
If you cannot accept that others can enjoy their lives without
believing in the things that you believe in, I would suggest that your
beliefs may not be as strong as you'd like to think.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
