Most Atheists are scared that they might be wrong. So instead of softening their stance, they just keep digging a deeper hole.
If a spine closes up or a jaw regenerates, to them it isn't a miracle. Nothing is proof enough. Just like the original OJ jury who wouldn't have convicted even with the murder captured on video tape, no amount of proof is enough for the Atheist. ************************************************* 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 --- On Sun, 2/1/09, Geoff Flight <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Geoff Flight <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character reference from Castro > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 2:08 AM > Ive been around a long time and heard pretty much all the > anti-God > arguments. The vast majority of them boil down to 'what > have You done for > me.... lately?'. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of John > Sent: Sunday, 1 February 2009 5:26 PM > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character > reference from > Castro > > Ed is a believer too. He BELIEVES there is no God, but he > can't prove it. He > has stronger faith than we Christians. He believes all this > stuff came from > nowhere. His kids must have been able to get away with > murder by saying, "I > didn't do it", and if he didn't see it, he > would believe them. > > John Harvey > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Geoff Flight > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 12:49 AM > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character > reference from > Castro > > You have an extremely narrow (and inaccurate) understanding > of logic. Logic > seeks after order and constistency. Belief in God is itself > not illogical > nor is it a definition of illogical. The inability to prove > something does > not render the hypothesis intrinsically illogical not > incorrect. You are > making the classic mistake of viewing everything through > the prism of your > belief and ignoring everything else (and deriding it) while > criticizing > believers who do the same thing. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Saturday, 31 January 2009 2:20 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character > reference from > Castro > > On Jan 30, 2009, at 8:57 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: > > >> It was not a big ball of dust; it was a point > source of nothing. > >> Something > >> we cannot imagine. > > -------------------------------- > > > > Can I repeat that please? Something we cannot > imagine. > > Oh, sure. But you have no problem imagining an entity that > could > create not only that unimaginable thing, but an infinite > number of > other equally unimaginable things. Sure, that sounds > reasonable. > > It constantly amazes me how believers try to use logic to > discuss > something that is by definition illogical. I suppose by now > I should > expect this sort of contradiction, but I guess it never > ceases to > amaze me that otherwise thinking beings have no problem > spewing this > garbage under the guise of "logic". > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
