Geoff Flight wrote: > Absolute proof? Nope. > Neither absolute nor relative. Of the thousands of things that happened between diagnosis and cure you chose to highlight prayer. Why did you choose to highlight that amongst thousands of others? Because it suits your beliefs, absolutely no other reason. > But standing where I am, seeing what I have seen and having experienced > first-hand the miraculous power of God, The power that stems out of your choice to see prayer associated with cure. > your 'arguments' look faintly ridiculous. When you have seen hearing > restored, bones healed and reformed in an instant and disabled children > restored, doubt in the existence of God disappears and trust, not only in His > power but also His character, is the only natural result. > You saw all these miracles happen? Wow! Either you are a holy man or you have lived hundreds of years in thousands of places to be able to see all these miracles (or you enjoy watching Yank evangelists on tv).
> If it had been YOUR daughter I have no doubt your opinion would have been > completely opposite. > Yup! I would have damned the son of a bitch for making her be born in such a state. Because of course you can understand that if he gets the merit of curing her, he also gets the blame of getting her into that predicament. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
