Once again, almost every commentator says that the American economy is in
such awful shape that the other comparison to be made is the Great
Depression. Sure, you are a long way from there but the other thing you
ignore is that things are still getting worse. You haven't turned the corner
yet. IN fact, you ahvent even stopped dropping. You seem to want to not
believe in just how bad things really are. Without major intervention, your
economy could end up in a Depression. Everyone (or almost everyone)
recognizes that as a reality. 1981/82 is NOTHING compared to this. That was
a downturn - a cyclical recession. THIS is a completely different animal.
Job losses are only just starting. 2009 could easily be the worst year of
any year since the depression. In fact, it will take a miracle for it to be
anything else.

Oh and by the way, on behalf of the rest of the world, thanks for another
glimpse at a Great Depression. Wasn't one enough?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bob Calco
Sent: Tuesday, 17 February 2009 12:21 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: [OT] Obama's Rhetoric Is the Real 'Catastrophe'

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123457303244386495.html

or

http://tinyurl.com/bxqpb3

- - -
President Barack Obama has turned fearmongering into an art form. He has
repeatedly raised the specter of another Great Depression. First, he did so
to win votes in the November election. He has done so again recently to sway
congressional votes for his stimulus package.

In his remarks, every gloomy statistic on the economy becomes a harbinger of
doom. As he tells it, today's economy is the worst since the Great
Depression. Without his Recovery and Reinvestment Act, he says, the economy
will fall back into that abyss and may never recover.

This fearmongering may be good politics, but it is bad history and bad
economics. It is bad history because our current economic woes don't come
close to those of the 1930s. At worst, a comparison to the 1981-82 recession
might be appropriate. Consider the job losses that Mr. Obama always cites.
In the last year, the U.S. economy shed 3.4 million jobs. That's a grim
statistic for sure, but represents just 2.2% of the labor force. From
November 1981 to October 1982, 2.4 million jobs were lost -- fewer in number
than today, but the labor force was smaller. So 1981-82 job losses totaled
2.2% of the labor force, the same as now.

Job losses in the Great Depression were of an entirely different magnitude.
In 1930, the economy shed 4.8% of the labor force. In 1931, 6.5%. And then
in 1932, another 7.1%. Jobs were being lost at double or triple the rate of
2008-09 or 1981-82.

This was reflected in unemployment rates. The latest survey pegs U.S.
unemployment at 7.6%. That's more than three percentage points below the
1982 peak (10.8%) and not even a third of the peak in 1932 (25.2%). You
simply can't equate 7.6% unemployment with the Great Depression.

Other economic statistics also dispel any analogy between today's economic
woes and the Great Depression. Real gross domestic product (GDP) rose in
2008, despite a bad fourth quarter. The Congressional Budget Office projects
a GDP decline of 2% in 2009. That's comparable to 1982, when GDP contracted
by 1.9%. It is nothing like 1930, when GDP fell by 9%, or 1931, when GDP
contracted by another 8%, or 1932, when it fell yet another 13%.

Auto production last year declined by roughly 25%. That looks good compared
to 1932, when production shriveled by 90%. The failure of a couple of dozen
banks in 2008 just doesn't compare to over 10,000 bank failures in 1933, or
even the 3,000-plus bank (Savings & Loan) failures in 1987-88. Stockholders
can take some solace from the fact that the recent stock market debacle
doesn't come close to the 90% devaluation of the early 1930s.

Mr. Obama's analogies to the Great Depression are not only historically
inaccurate, they're also dangerous. Repeated warnings from the White House
about a coming economic apocalypse aren't likely to raise consumer and
investor expectations for the future. In fact, they have contributed to the
continuing decline in consumer confidence that is restraining a spending
pickup. Beyond that, fearmongering can trigger a political stampede to
embrace a "recovery" package that delivers a lot less than it promises. A
more cool-headed assessment of the economy's woes might produce better
policies.
- - -

Finally some historical and economic perspective. 

- Bob


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to