Hey, Ed - - I re-read your post -- now I understand point you were making. I'm sorry.
I hope you can see how using words like "sloppy" could put one on the defensive. Ken On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Feb 16, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Ken Kixmoeller/fh wrote: > >> Holy Smoke! Such pedantry over one innocent question. > > > It's not pedantry; it's simply the difference between correct > programming and good enough programming. That was my point: while > asking for data that is not needed is not correct, in this case it's > NBD; it's good enough for the limited task at hand. > > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ab97d29b-62ca-4599-9591-95a3142a3...@information-architecture.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
