Well however they determined that some were underpaid, and if they legitamantly where then it could be said that they "deserve" and should get more money. Those that got overpaid, no one has said by how much, which would be interesting to know. And second, they cashed the check and microsoft sent the check and allowed it to be cashed. They should be allowed to keep the money as technically they both made a deal and both parties accepted it. And from what i could gather from the articles microsoft is "asking" for the money back, not "demandinga" which leads me to believe that there is little legal action they could do to get the money back.
Just my 10 cents Mike Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Sytze de Boer <sy...@kiss.co.nz> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:07:43 To: <profoxt...@leafe.com> Subject: Re: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back Then I must be an idiot. Mistakes happen. Are you saying the ones who were underpaid (and who are asking for an adjustment) are also idiots? On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Michael Madigan <mmadi10...@yahoo.com>wrote: > > Only an idiot would send them back their money. > > ************************************************* > 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336 > > > --- On Mon, 2/23/09, MB Software Solutions General Account < > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > > > From: MB Software Solutions General Account < > mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> > > Subject: [NF] M$ wants their layoff $$ back > > To: profox@leafe.com > > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 3:57 PM > > Sad, but true: > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,498666,00.html > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > > Subscription Maintenance: > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > > OT-free version of this list: > > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > > This message: > > > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/30928.69.7.77.20.1235422639.squir...@webmail.dssco.net > > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/367498c40902231307g179c3d35j1bfe161082063...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Report [OT] Abuse: http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/367498c40902231307g179c3d35j1bfe161082063...@mail.gmail.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2036417547-1235427784-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-21280220...@bxe1268.bisx.prod.on.blackberry ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
