On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jean Laeremans <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:29 PM, John Weller <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes - that was good! The only real problem with WP was that when Windows >> came along they were too arrogant (at least that was my impression) to >> embrace the major advantage of Windows at that time which was that printer >> and displays were shared so you didn't have to install separate drivers for >> your printer and monitor for each application. Instead they insisted on >> printing via their install of the printer. >> > > Oh i do agree about that one WP6 was a shambles . > BTW you do know were MS got the ideas for word. Word wasn't the 1st > real windows wordprocessor you know..... -------------------
I used AmiPro and it was better than Word was at that time. Put WP to shame in the blue screen days. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
