I tried anchor but it failed on one thing. I have a class I drop on a form
to find the top/left size etc. It puts the form in the same place and size
when opened that it closed at last time. Anchor does not respect this change
and the controls seem to stay in the same place/size as if the form was not
resized.
The only way is to turn off anchor, resize the control and reset the anchor.
It takes away from what could be a useful property because each control must
be placed before anchor is enabled.
Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: 13 March 2009 02:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Good reasons to upgrade (was Re: FW: Autoincrement field)

That's what the .Anchor property is for.  A value of 5 (top and bottom
absolute) might be what you need.

Fred


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:03 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Kevin Cully wrote:
> > I've been just calling the grid.AutoFit() method to optimize the grid
> > columns, assuming that there isn't a huge text field being displayed.
> > Would there be other downsides to calling that method?
>
>
> I too always just used AutoSize for the horizontal display.  What I'm
> looking for is a way for the grid to expand VERTICALLY when my user
> increases the height of the form.  This is one of those on my low
> priorities list that never seems to be gotten to.  ;-)
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to