Will,
I agree with your sentiments about Servoy entirely. I say it at Foxforward
in Atlanta 18 months ago and was initially impressed at the concept but on
investigation it turned out to be a big flop.

Anyone thinking that this is a VFP replacement certainly hasn't looked at
the product in depth. Put simply - it is not.

Dave Crozier


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of William Sanders / EFG
Sent: 24 March 2009 22:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: FoxPro, is .Net your only option?]

Not Fox Related.

But - to keep this thread on topic -
I'll suggest to you that you re-evaluate the TSX-32 operating system,
and run your FoxPro 2.6/DOS apps across the internet via tsx's telnet.

Super Secure ! Mondo Sharp !
Super Fast !

But not cheap.

Cheaper than Servoy, at the 1200 seat count comparison.
Heck - even at the 10 seat count comparison - TSX-32 beats em.

But I digress, a little.

Michael Babcock - Servoy is not something I would recommend VFP developers
to use.  If you have to ask me why, then I must only think that you
haven't spent any time to evaluate the product.

Even then I wouldn't recommend it to other developers.

If yer telling Developers, directly or indirectly, to migrate to another
Toolset, then you should have AT LEAST put a fripping [NF] in the topic.

Servoy wants VFP developers to use its toolset.  Period.  Mentioning it
here without the [NF] tag is, imo, BAD FORM.

Senior Moments Rock !! [Bill]
-- 
William Sanders / efGroup


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/108251d9f48d47b6a5e2cf5001a17...@develop
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to