On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:41 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, April 14, 2009 2:36 pm, Stephen Russell wrote: >> So you are upset that as a computer professional you were caught off >> guard that a major application used worldwide changed 2 years ago in >> particular working with your bread and butter and you just found out? >> >> Sorry to hear about that. I thought that was why we got MSDN >> subscriptions, to keep aware of what was happening. >> >> how big are the XML files anyway? in kb or megs I am asking. >> >> Is there a change in layout from last years files to todays? > > > No, I think he's justifiably upset because there was no need to take the > DBF export option out of Excel. I can see no benefit to MS to do such a > feature drop. (...resisting conspiracy theories!!! haha) -----------------------------
Wasn't it always listed as dBase3 or dBase4 file type? They never even took possession of their own name. I wonder if you could take it back to Access instead of dbf? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
