I have been doing mostly Windows VMware Workstation v-6.5, although I did
license the Linux version as well.  In all cases the client OS is Win2k Pro
SP4.  I simply use the internal Windows backup, and point the backup target
to a shared HDD, mapped as a network logical drive, hosted on the Host OS.
Then, for the Windows XP Pro Server OS I use both Ghost to do a weekly
image, and SyncBack to do a weekly full backup, and a SyncBack again to do a
daily (the remaining 5 days of the week) incremental backup.  Those Image
and SyncBack files are backed up to an external 1.5 Tb Seagate Xtreme
FreeAgent HDD connected either via USB2 or (preferably) eSATA.  The XP Pro
is set up to have the VSS Service running, so the VMWare .vmx and related
files all get fully backed up with Syncback, and of course with Ghost also.

For the Linux Host, I do the same thing using plain vanilla Windows backup
for each guest OS.  I have yet to automate the Host Ubuntu Linux OS machine,
just because I haven't.  But I will likely use the same old TAR command I am
using with one of my main Ubuntu Linux Servers.

Also, I have played with VMware Server 2 long enough to know it offers no
appreciable performance advantages over the VMware Workstation.  So I am not
going to remain on that track.  Why not?  Because I finally bit the bullet
and looked into the VMware ESXi Server!

ESXi does not use a traditional Windows or Linux Host OS.  It has its own
very thin platform (looks like Linux, but they say it isn't), and it
installs Bare Metal onto the PC/Server platform.  The Guest OS machines are
either built or imported via using a Windows PC harnessing their ESXi Client
app.  I was able to download the VMware Conversion app (far punchier than
the Import/Export Wizard in Workstation), and converted my VMX files
directly into the ESXi Server.  Then using the ESXi Client I altered the
converted virtual machine for the purpose I had in mind.  I am in the midst
of completing my first ESXi build with the VMX conversions, but thus far it
looks like this is the Real deal with the kind of load balancing I need for
even greater density levels of Guest OS machines running concurrently
without choking.  

I am running on a 60 day trial, and the license I will get is the baseline
$995 package, at least for now.  If I can get at least 4 Guest machines to
run well concurrently I can easily invest justify that price.  If I can get
a few more such machines to run on top of that I will be thrilled.  Next on
my list, if this works as well as promised, a dual quad core XEON Server
with a few gazillion Gb of RAM and lots of storage interfaces.

I have not been this excited about diving into a new technology (for me)
since I first tore into VFP3!  Anyway, if you like VMware Server 2 and/or
VMware Workstation, but find you can't get the performance you need beyond 3
machines (with dual core P4 and 8Gb RAM under Ubuntu Linux Server 64 bit),
give the VMware ESXi platform a shot.  I bet you never look back.  Very
cool.

BTW, the ESXi package with their Fundamentals ($995) level includes guest
machine backups.  I have yet to set that up, but it is on my To Do list for
later this week, likely Wednesday.


Gil


Gil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:profoxtech-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Malcolm Greene
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 5:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [NF] Suggestions on how to automate VM Server client backups?
> 
> Looking for suggestions on the best way to automate the backup
> of  VMware Server client VM's where the host OS is either Windows
> or Linux.
> Thanks!
> Malcolm
> 
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to