Bob Calco wrote: >> Hi Bob! >> >> "Once in a while was tongue in cheek". You should be attending every >> meeting. Get to know them and let them get to know you. >> >> The liberalism is mostly due to the economy. If that gets back up the >> Rs >> will move sharply right. >> > > It's not cyclical liberalism that's going on here, and the economy won't > pick up from it. In fact, that would be a disaster for Obama if it did, > which is why he pumped $1.2 trillion of fiat money into the banking system > recently---that will guarantee hyperinflation a year or two down the road. > Are you paying any attention to what is happening? Are you following the > bankruptcy cases of Chrysler and GM (and boy aren't ya glad we bailed them > out to prevent this)? Do you not see the brazen undermining of the rule of > law he's getting away with (so far), the way he bullies companies around? > > This is unprecedented stuff, and there's nothing classically or > contemporarily "liberal" about it. Obama is a leftist-groomed > dictator-in-waiting who is going through the motions of democracy, full of > lofty phrases that look nothing like his strong-arm tactics, even as he > works to undermine it, not unlike Chavez. How else to explain ACORN getting > billions of dollars in "stimulus" money to keep doing what they're doing > (rampant voter registration fraud, intimidating businesses, etc.), and then > some? How else to explain his mandatory volunteerism initiative? Every > dictatorial regime has this kind of thing--the Soviet "Pioneers," the Nazi > brownshirts. Obama is going to have his green shirts, too. And they aren't > even hiding their actual intent very well. > > The uncountable and unaccountable trillions that we're throwing around after > the mysterious and curiously unexplored events of Sept 18, 2008, have no > parallel in our or anybody else's history. The deficit spending Obama has > proposed we embark upon for the next decade eclipses anything Bush ever did > budget-wise. Bush's $400 billion annual deficits pale by comparison to > Obama's $1.8 trillion annual deficits... which he promises, oh boy, to cut > in half in 10 years... still leaving us with the smallest Obama deficits > being twice the size of Bush's worst. But Bush was the irresponsible one. > Bush made him do it. Right. > > And as for his war promises. He's increasing the troops to Afghanistan (the > actual quagmire, truth be told) after the model of the now suddenly > successful Iraq surge. He has reversed himself quietly on a host of issues > related to wiretapping etc. Even the dems are throwing cold water on his > plans to release Guantanamo terrorists to facilities in the US where > ostensibly their Constitutional rights will finally be respected, but that > won't deter him. It's all insane, what's going on. > > I don't see how we don't suffer negative consequences for a long time to > come. I'm not even sure how our system survives this man. > Are you practicing your writing by trying a Ludlum BS (Best Seller... or Bull Shit, take your pick) style?
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
