Sure they do, the mosques are full of hate speech.

************************************************* 
Join the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT!

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419


--- On Tue, 5/26/09, Adam Buckland <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Adam Buckland <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [OT] Britain is now the "savage" nation
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 12:08 PM
> The Government has only said that
> he's not welcome. There may be anti
> govt protests, but it's their right to not let in
> foreigners they
> believe will further incite racial hatred and not be
> conducive to the
> good of the UK.
> 
> In the UK he does not have an unfettered right to free
> speech, the Govt
> believe he isn't welcome and they act on behalf of the
> subjects of the
> UK and so he's not allowed in. If he didn't want to be in
> this position
> he shouldn't have spouted the venomous bile he has that
> have made him to
> be considered a threat to the well being of the UK.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> Behalf Of Bob Calco
> Sent: 26 May 2009 16:58
> To: 'ProFox Email List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Britain is now the "savage" nation
> 
> > >  As Pete pointed out Savage
> > > can be rude and say some shocking things, but
> he's never broken any
> > laws or
> > > advocated anybody break any laws, and he has a
> huge audience that
> > enjoys his
> > > eclectic views. He's by no means a cookie-cutter
> conservative talk
> > show
> > > host.
> > >
> > I repeat, he was not accused of breaking laws. He is
> just not welcome
> > by
> > the current govt., the Brits need no "reason" to stop
> him from
> > entering,
> > if his face is not liked by the civil servant who is
> checking him he
> > may
> > be rejected. Unless........ Oh! You mean there are
> different rules
> that
> > apply to different nationalities? I thought we were
> all equal! I'm
> > shocked!
> 
> This has nothing to do with nationality or race, your
> insistence on
> going
> there is a canard.
> 
> It is a defamation case, and in fact Savage has an
> excellent chance of
> winning it. Unlike in the US, the UK has rather strong
> anti-defamation
> laws,
> and many lawyers in England have been chomping at the bit
> to represent
> him.
> 
> They specifically gave reasons, and they were bogus and
> quite easily
> disputed reasons. They claimed he was a threat to incite
> violence --
> which
> he never has -- even as they let muslim clerics in with a
> history of
> doing
> so right inside England no less. They tolerate muslim
> anti-government
> demonstrations right in the heart of London daily, but are
> afraid of a
> talk
> show host? It's really colossally stupid on their part.
> 
> > > Anyway I'd be fighting mad too if I was lumped
> together with Martha
> > Stewart,
> > > Russian skin-head murderers, and known terrorists
> and a foreign
> > government
> > > made a big display of maligning my character.
> > >
> > Sorry to tell you Bobby, but I talked with my family,
> and you are not
> > welcome to my home. Nor is Martha Stewart, the Russian
> skin-head
> > murderers (or any kind of murderer from any
> nationality) and any known
> > terrorists (including GWB). And please don't take this
> as a defamation
> > of character. Even if I make a big display of this, I
> am not maligning
> > your character, just stating that we don't want you at
> home near our
> > kids.
> 
> Actually, this is a tremendous relief. I was afraid you
> might invite
> me...
> :)
> 
> - Bob
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to