On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:31 -0500, "Stephen Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why would M$ avoid VFP porting to the CLR is probably a better Q. Well, we have the Dynamic Language Runtime now as well of course. A far better fit for re-engineering something that has VFP syntax. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
