My workstations eventually loose contact with the DC if the DNS is
anywhere else.  I don't remember the error that shows up but it becomes
very annoying as it takes a long time to show but eventually does at the
most inconvenient time.

I'm wondering if I can solve the problem by giving out an Internet
address as the secondary DNS instead of the router address.  I wanted to
use the router address because the router gets its DNS addresses from ISP
and if they change the router will automatically adjust.  Perhaps there
is a way to have DD-WRT pass on the DNS addresses it gets from the WAN
side to its DNS clients.  I'll post again when I have more answers.

Thank - Joe

On Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:11 AM, Michael Madigan wrote:
>
>Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Michael Madigan
>To: [email protected]
>cc:
>Subject: Re: [NF] handling a missing DNS server
>
>Why don't you just use the router since that has to be up?  
>
>
> 
>
>--- On Tue, 6/16/09, Joe Yoder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Joe Yoder <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [NF] handling a missing DNS server
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 11:55 PM
>> I have a small LAN where I need
>> workstations to use the DNS server on the Domain Controller
>> when it is up.  When the DC is down I want the
>> workstations to use the DNS server built into the
>> router.  I am now using a router running DD-WRT as a
>> DHCP server to give out the IP address of DC as the first
>> DNS Server and the IP address of the router as the second
>> DNS Server.
>>  
>> While the DC is up all is well but when the DC is down the
>> workstations apparently don't use the second DNS Server
>> address as a ping to www.yahoo.com returns "Ping request
>> could not find host www.yahoo.com"
>>  
>> Can someone help me understand why Windows doesn't use the
>> second DNS Server when the first one is not available and
>> suggest an alternative solution?
>>  
>> TIA - Joe Yoder
>> 
>> 
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/alternative
>>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>>   text/html
>> ---
>> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to