On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the nth time, I've had Gallery do a nuclear meltdown on my > servers. Rather than running it myself, I'd be glad to host my > pictures on someone else's boxes. I'd want high reliability, > availability and a good chance they'd stay in business for a decade or > two. Ideally, some private space to share family pictures with a > restricted group and public space with clearly licensed pics (CC > ShareAlike NonCommercial is my usual choice) would be good. Free or > reasonable rates considered. Any recommendations, pro or con? > > I've seen various people use Snapfish, SmugMug, Flickr, Picasa. Anyone > as nuts for one of these (or something else) as Malcolm is for, well, > you know. > > -- > Ted Roche > Ted Roche & Associates, LLC > http://www.tedroche.com > I've had good luck with SmugMug. Check out http://socalhiker.smugmug.com if you wish... Bill Anderson --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
