I've got a client that has heavily invested in modifications to an
AccountMate accounting system over the years that's in FPD.  They still have
me adding new functionality, but wherever I can, I try to do the new things
in VFP.  Seems to run fine on XP and Vista workstations.

Fred


On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Geoff <[email protected]> wrote:

> on the subject of FP DOS, I saw a short contract today for FoxPro2 . hard
> to
> imagine anyone even KEEPING a DOS app now nevermind extending it!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Sytze de Boer
> Sent: Thursday, 3 September 2009 12:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: VFP9 - Set relation
>
> Ken, I'm sorry, when I exit the 2nd form by using SET RELA TO or your
> suggestion  SET RELATION OFF into TableA, I still end up with just 1 record
> in TableA
>
> Beats me why you think it is FP DOS
> Have you been talking with Mr Roche today?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Ken Kixmoeller/fh <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Sytze de Boer wrote:
> >
> > > Is there something else I should do ?
> >
> > Gee, that is an old one, straining the old grey matter (hair):
> >
> >  SET RELATION OFF into TableA
> >
> > Something like that, assuming that TableB is the parent in the
> > relation, as it sounded from your description.
> >
> > What is this, FP DOS?
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to