On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:26 -0400, "MB Software Solutions,LLC" <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul McNett wrote: > > Funny thing is, it's been recommended practice for like 10 years now to > > close ports > > 135-139 and 445 on the firewall. > > > > Are people really still leaving these open to outside attack? > > > Oh come on, Paul...you know better...most folks out there have NO idea > of what you speak let alone are taking the necessary precautions. >
I would have thought they were closed by default by Windows Direwall -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
