I think NF is considered a non-OT post. --- On Thu, 10/1/09, Tracy Pearson <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Tracy Pearson <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: ProFox List Statistics for September, 2009 > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 3:12 PM > I'm not sure the numbers are > accurate. > On-topic posts for me was 13, [NF] posts were 3, total > posts 13. The math > doesn't add right in my head. But the logic behind the > numbers, I might be > missing. > > <shrug> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gene Wirchenko > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 3:03 PM > > At 11:32 2009-10-01, List Administrator Account <[email protected]> > wrote: > >================================================== > >ProFox List Statistics > >September, 2009 > >================================================== > >Subscriber Count at End of Month: > > > ProFox: 353 > > > ProFoxTech: 200 > >================================================== > > > >Total Posts: 967 > >(Down 31.95% from August, 2009) > > > >Total [OT] Posts: 241 > >(Down 45.6% from August, 2009) > > > >Total [NF] Posts: 216 > >(Down 45.59% from August, 2009) > > As on-topic posts are presumably the > reason that this list exists, how > a statement about them? Reversing the percentages to > get August's figures > (respectively, 1421, 443, and 397), I get 581 presumably > on-topic posts in > August and 510 in September giving: > > Presumably on-topic posts: 510 > (Down 12.22% from August, 2009) > > [snip] > > Sincerely, > > Gene Wirchenko > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000901ca42cb$11e38c40$35aaa4...@com > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
