Michael Madigan wrote: > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091005/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_shroud_of_turin > > If their conclusions are correct, all they've succeeded in proving is that > the relic is fake, which a lot of Christians believe too. > > Their goal is to prove that God doesn't exist. If God doesn't exist, you > can't disprove a negative.
Hi Michael, They have only succeeded in proving that it is possible *now* to fake a relic using old materials. However, does their relic have the wealth of detail that Dr. Barbet found when he studied it nearly 100 years ago? Not only that. Radioisotope dating could have inadvertently measured some repair material rather than original material. About the time the repairs were made there were re-weavers working who were able to make invisible repairs to cloth. This art flourished because cloth was expensive in those days. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
