The really interesting posts are the ones where you complain about the list over and over again. I'm sure everyone looks forward to those posts as much as I do.
--- On Sun, 10/11/09, Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Gene Wirchenko <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OT] What Obama Found in his Cracker Jack Box Today > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 7:07 PM > At 22:37 2009-10-09, Tina Currie > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >People please...! > > > >As an active developer in Fox, I love that I have > access to a WORLDWIDE > >network of like-minded developers that I can call on > for assistance if need > >be, or just follow along with other's requests for > assistance and now and > >then find a nugget of knowledge that I didn't realise I > needed. Gold! > > > >I think the key word here is "worldwide". This is > a worldwide forum. But > >lately I find it's the "State your view on US Politics" > forum. > > Yes. I am Canadian and I find > the U.S. politics flames to be a > waste of time. It happens in many discussion > areas. The behaviour > in ProFox is especially bad. It has gotten to the > point that if I > ever host a forum, U.S. politics will be explicitly > off-topic *and* > not permitted. There is something about U.S. politics > that can make > otherwise nice people rather rude, opinionated jerks. > Then, there > are those who started as rather rude, opinionated jerks. > > [snip] > > >P.S. If there is some way to not receive all the > posts that are [OT] or > >[NF], someone let me in on the secret please? > > There is a list for that. Ed, > please mention the details. The > problem is that some of the [OT] and [NF] posts are of > interest to > me. Perhaps, a tag of [USP] should be added for U.S. > politics posts. > > >P.P.S And now that I've gone and declared how I feel... > will you still help > >me with FoxPro when I need it? :-) > > You mean act as if FoxPro is the focus > of this forum? Is that > allowed? I know: it will have to be allowed. > Given the number of > [OT] posts, we FoxPro posters can claim minority status. > > Yes. > > [snip] > > Sincerely, > > Gene Wirchenko > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
