Wasn't thinking about anything special. First, I wanted to get advice on whether others were using it or not. I fear it looking like a crutch. I'm prepared to go the plain .Net way, or at least use some other popular community tool that does not have a VFP association to avoid potential sneers.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VFP toolkit for .Net On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Matt Slay <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone actually used this function toolkit in a .NET app? Did this > library ever catch on in the .Net world? > > http://foxcentral.net/microsoft/VFPToolkitNET.htm > > I'm just wondering if it is a good idea to use something like this in .Net, > or if there are other more commonly used libraries to add string handling > functionality to .Net apps. > > Would other devs see this as some weakness to hang on to a bunch of VFP > methods, or would it be some great tool that even non-VFP'ers would use. ------------------------- Never caught on to anyone who was nonVFP. The string handling in .NET is very good and VFP is just good. You have Stringbuilder in a base class from M$ now and it cranks over a straight string. What were you thinking of using out of it anyway? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer SQL Server DBA Web and Winform Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/030201ca4b5a$bab64e10$3022ea...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
