On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Bob Calco <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Fox has been holding back on the birth certificate information.
>>  Obama doesn't want them mad at him.
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> Do you believe everything that you read or write from your private
>> info sources?
>
> I actually know a professional private investigator who discovered that one
> of several SSNs associated with Obama belongs to a dead man from
> Connecticut, and that he submitted the information and how he verified it to
> Fox.
>
> I don't know what if anything Fox plans to do with the information, but they
> have it. And this guy, unlike me, isn't big into politics. Or at least he
> wasn't until recently.
>
> We are in a weird twilight zone right now. The government can contemplate a
> bill in which the federal government, under penalty of law (fines and even
> prison), can mandate that every citizen buy a particular product.... And yet
> when someone says "Hey, isn't that unconstitutional?" they're called
> racists. So all of this will play out in some unexpected ways over the next
> couple years.
----------------------------

I can't see the Swift Boaters, or any of their friends, holding back.
Sorry but the glory associated to whomever topples the President would
be more then having the gas engine that gets 70+ mpg.  They just
doesn't exist.


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
SQL Server DBA
Web and Winform Development
Independent Contractor
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to