Paul The promulgation/publication of any conclusion based on such a small sample size is at best irresponsible and at worst borders on fraud and as such the perpetrators should be criminally liable ...
Paul (Newton) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul McNett" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, 26 October, 2009 21:20:42 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: IT leaders trust Microsoft more than Google, 2-1 MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=3207&tag=nl.e101 > > Well, I'm sure that's welcome news to MS. All too often, it's just > negative MS-bashing headlines out there. Well, I'm no statistician, but I thought a sample size of twelve was a little low for coming to conclusions about. A frakking *pie chart* based on 12 responses! Incredulously yours, Paul [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
