What you need in the way of protection depends on where you 
are.  If you're in France, and crime, drug wars, civil 
unrest, ethnic friction, and physical violence are all very 
much under control with a well trained, fast responding 
police force, then you may not feel a need to have a means 
to protect yourself should the sh:t hit the fan, but my 
faith in others for protection is not so strong.  I became 
spoiled during the TET offensive in early 1968, when I had 
access to my M-16 just a few feet away from me, which was 
very reassuring.

If I lived in a area torn by war, whether convention war 
like those in Iraq and Afghanistan or non convention war 
like in Mexico between drug cartels or drug cartels versus 
law/military enforcement, then I might feel a need for more 
than even a flame-thrower; although, a flame-thrower really 
doesn't seem like the right tool, except for use in 
convention warfare.

Anyone can be caught unprotected in a life threatening 
situation, (eg being in the wrong place at the wrong time), 
but if at all possible, I would rather be safe, (eg armed 
and ready to protect myself), than sorry.

Regards,

LelandJ


On 11/10/2009 08:50 AM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA
> <[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Below is a link to an article supporting the other side of
>> the argument about whether civilian should have access to
>> armor piercing bullets:
>>
> ROFL
>
> All that pussyfooting...i want a flame-thrower...
>
> A+
> jml
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to