I sincerely doubt that you are capable of explaining it in anything
other than simple terms.
I see, you don't think that there is a word to adequately describe
discrimination based on religious preference so you substituted a word
that is sure to fan the flames. Racism has nothing to do with it.
Oh and I'm not being discriminating of any group but thanks for lumping
me in with some group that you see in the dark. Wait might that be a
pot calling the kettle black situation? I think so.
Now how does either of your weak analogies work since I don't have a low
IQ, am not humourless nor was I born in the US? Oops.
-----
::moii
-----
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Nobody is playing anything, except perhaps for you.
> So you're not playing.... they you..... ok, understood. I'll try and
> explain it in simple terms.
>> You put forth an
>> allegation of racism but backed it up with religious examples so I
>> merely asked you to provide some clarification of your point.
> Yes, no problem. You see, I don't think there is a word for
> "religious-ism" or "discriminat-ism", so racism may well do. The point
> is that you are discriminating and being pejorative to a whole group of
> people, be it race or religion is incidental.
> Let's see if I can make it simpler, it is as if I were to discriminate
> you based on IQ (as in "US born low IQ") or on lack of humour ("US born
> Humourless"). Get it?
>
>> Perhaps
>> it is something that you are incapable of and, if so, I'll just have to
>> accept your post at it's face value.
>>
> That might also be. But in that case I would clarify it in Spanish and
> you, with your renowned gift of tongues, would see my meaning.
>
>> -----
>> ::moii
>> -----
>>
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>>>
>>>> When did Muslim become a race?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You are certainly playing dumb, so I'm not going to answer.
>>> ...
>>> ..
>>> .
>>> You ARE playing dumb. Are'nt you?
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> ::moii
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Do they have "US born Catholic", "US born buddhist", "US born
>>>>> episcopalian" categories too? Or are they just being racist as usual?
>>>>>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
