http://bit.ly/EtEQr

- - -
ABC News' Jonathan Karl reports:

What does it take to get a wavering senator to vote for health care reform?

Here’s a case study.

On page 432 of the Reid bill, there is a section increasing federal
Medicaid subsidies for “certain states recovering from a major
disaster.”

The section spends two pages defining which “states” would qualify,
saying, among other things, that it would be states that “during the
preceding 7 fiscal years” have been declared a “major disaster area.”

I am told the section applies to exactly one state:  Louisiana, the
home of moderate Democrat Mary Landrieu, who has been playing hard to
get on the health care bill.

In other words, the bill spends two pages describing would could be
written with a single world:  Louisiana.  (This may also help explain
why the bill is long.)

Senator Harry Reid, who drafted the bill, cannot pass it without the
support of Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu.

How much does it cost?  According to the Congressional Budget Office:
$100 million.

Here’s the incredibly complicated language:

SEC. 2006. SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT TO FMAP DETERMINATION FOR CERTAIN STATES
RECOVERING FROM A MAJOR DISASTER.

Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d), as amended
by sections 2001(a)(3) and
2001(b)(2), is amended— (1) in subsection (b), in the first sentence,
by striking ‘‘subsection (y)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (y) and
(aa)’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(aa)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (b), beginning January 1, 2011,
the Federal medical assistance percentage for a fiscal year for a
disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State shall be equal to the
following:
‘(A) In the case of the first fiscal year (or part of a fiscal year)
for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical
assistance percentage determined for the fiscal year without regard to
this subsection and subsection (y), increased by 50 percent of the
number of percentage points by which the Federal medical assistance
percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard
to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal
medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the
preceding fiscal year after the application of only subsection (a) of
section 5001 of Public Law 111–5 (if applicable to the preceding
fiscal year) and without regard to this subsection, subsection (y),
and subsections (b) and (c) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5.

‘‘(B) In the case of the second or any succeeding fiscal year for
which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical
assistance percentage determined for the preceding fiscal year under
this subsection for the State, increased by 25 percent of the number
of percentage points by which the Federal medical assistance
percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard
to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal
medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the
preceding fiscal year under this subsection.

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment
State’ means a State that is one of
the 50 States or the District of Columbia, for which, at any time
during the preceding 7 fiscal years, the President has declared a
major disaster under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act and determined as a result of such
disaster that every county or parish in the State warrant individual
and public assistance or public assistance from the Federal Government
under such Act and for which— ‘‘(A) in the case of the first fiscal
year (or part of a fiscal year) for which this subsection applies to
the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for
the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and
subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage
determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year after the
application of only subsection (a) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5
(if applicable to the preceding fiscal year) and without regard to
this subsection, subsection (y), and subsections (b) and (c) of
section 5001 of Public Law 111–5, by at least 3 percentage points; and
‘‘(B) in the case of the second or any succeeding fiscal year for
which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical
assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year
without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the
Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the
preceding fiscal year under this subsection by at least 3 percentage
points.

‘‘(3) The Federal medical assistance percentage determined for a
disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State under paragraph (1) shall
apply for purposes of this title (other than with respect to
disproportionate share hospital payments described in section 1923 and
payments under this title that are based on the enhanced FMAP
described in 2105(b)) and shall not apply with respect to payments
under title IV (other than under part E of title IV) or payments under
title XXI.’’.

- - -

Didn't the President promise this kind of special-interest,
pork-barrel wheeling-and-dealing would end when he was inaugurated?

How's that hope and change working out for YOU?

- Publius

"It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country,
under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object
of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to
subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign
powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of
them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be
avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose
situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful
and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to