On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Michael Madigan <[email protected]> wrote: > What a great idea! Put the enemy in charge of security. > > Isn't this called treason? > > http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/134466 >
It's genius, really. The Left made a pact with radical Islam to destroy America from within as both of them hate it for different reasons (enemy of my enemy is my friend-type thinking). Don't take my word for it, take it from a former leftist, who knows "who's who" on the Left and has been tracking their alliance for some time: http://bit.ly/8BLlat And the amazing thing is, Americans voted for it! Of course, they thought they were voting for something very different--an enlightened, post-partisan, post-racial political savior, who would part the waters, heal the planet and eliminate the deficit with manna falling from heaven. The Left packaged this stink bomb very artfully (with gobs of Soros' cash and a relentless media and pop culture propaganda campaign, all things are eventually possible). And eventually these very leftists who orchestrated this colossal fraud will be beheaded by their very fair-weather friends in the "Muslim community" once the fight goes internecine. They actually think, some of them, that Obama is on their side! Ha! Should have *really* read his books (that is to say, critically) and taken the time to understand the man, and the stark contrast in which he stands to the myth. So, remind me, why did Obama ask Congress to back off an investigation of the Fort Hood terrorist incident, exactly? Would he have done so if the facts didn't so plainly point to a radical jihadist motive, and outright stupidity on the part of those who were supposed to be standing guard to prevent it? - Publius "It ought never to be forgotten, that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers, and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore ought in no case that can be avoided, to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." [Federalist Papers #59] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
